QUOTE (hippiepriest @ Aug 25 2009, 08:46 AM)

Thanks for the input Rev. Campbell. My thinking is that the Shepard's shirt simply says "Clergy", regardless of the religion. For instance, last year I went to Salem, Mass. which has a very strong pagan presence. While shopping in one of the shops I saw a woman wearing a Shepard's shirt and a pentagram. The first thing to enter my mind was "Hey, a Wicca Priestess." The second thing was, "I didn't know they wore the Shepard's shirt". To me she wasn't misrepresenting herself, her attire simply said "pagan clergy". I just didn't know if this was a common thing or not.
For the most part, I agree with your statement "If I were Pagan, I would not enlist the services of a Christian minister, so why would I expect him/her to look like one.", I have many Pagan friends who were married by Catholic priest and Protestant ministers because no Pagan priests were available. That's part of the reason I became ordained. In a situation like that I would put on distinctive pagan attire. However, for those who have no religious affiliation, or are Christian with no church home, I would want to wear something that easily identifies me as clergy.
Regretfully, even in this day and age, apperences do matter. A man wearing robes and carring a ceremonial dagger and wearing a turban would be consitered a threat. In some parts of our nation, even today, a Jewish Rabbi wearing a black hat, suit, neatly cut hair with side locks, would be treated with hostility and a Pagan wearing a robe with a pentigram consitered a devil worshiper. Wearing a formal religious outfit may in some cases detract form the work you are trying to do. Many Rabbis I know get by with a suit and a yamaca which Identifies them as Jewish and to many a Rabbi. At the same time I could go for rest home and hospital visits with nice casual cloths and a pentigram around my neck and be just as effective. But then, some people just want to see the uniform. They get extra comfort from it. It's like going to a doctor's office and being examened by a doctor in a t-shirt and jeans, or a doctor in scrubs or a white lab coat. Both may be equals, but were taught at an early age to respect the uniform. As long as you let people know who you are and what you believe you lessen the chance of being misunderstood.
Those are my thoughts. I look foward to hearing more from you. This is a very interesting topic.
Blessings Be.
Dear Hippiepriest,
In truth, all denominations have their own style of uniform of sorts, and all are recognizable as that belonging to a clergy member. (However, the general recognition of them depends on your exposure and the cultural norms you are familiar with.) It just depends on which one you want to use and who you are trying to please. Of course you can wear a Sheppard shirt, but then again you may wear a fez, robes, turbans, cassocks, or any combination of if you wish, but the question is why. Is it for you, or the people you are trying to serve? If it is for you, then it doesn’t really matter as long as you are comfortable with your choice. But if it is for those you serve, then your choice should reflect their comforts.
Now on to the Wicca Priestess you mentioned. My thoughts would have been mixed. The first thing I would have thought was “go Sister!” assuming another female finally stuck it out and made it through the grueling task of ordination from a Christian faith. I would have noticed the collar first and the pentagram second. In Canada, it is the norm for those clergy who are Catholic, or some other Christian denomination to wear the Sheppard shirt, and so at first glance, I would have assumed the same of her. Had I been an elderly person, I might not have been even able to see or recognize her pentagram. Same goes for a small child, though they could have seen the pentagram, they probably wouldn’t know what it represents. So though I believe she (the Priestess), had no intention of deception, I’m sure you can see my point about misunderstandings for others.
Wouldn’t it be nice if the leaders of this church put together an official uniform? One that does not reflect any other, and when once recognized the wearer would be known as one who belongs to a faith that is all encompassing? I think that would solve a lot of issues.
Ahh, just a thought anyway.
God’s blessings,
Rev. Campbell.