What then have the religions done for mankind that is good?
I will start by saying that this posting is in response to a question included in DW’s recent meditation post. I am posting it as a separate topic for a couple of reasons: 1. The post from DW is good in it’s message, and I do no want anyone to think that I am in anyway debating the points raised. 2. I feel this question is one that weighs on the mind of many people, and may in fact be deserving of it’s separateness from the overall message of the post on conflict and peace from which it is taken.
I would first like to share the thoughts of a news paper reporter in Britain on this subject. (the article I will be referencing can be found at:
http://japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/eo20070322gd.html ). The article is based on the results of a study regarding how large a percentage of different nations’ populations considered themselves religious, and how that played out in the social morality of the nations. The result truly did not surprise me, and I know it wont surprise many of you either. The more religious a nation considered itself, the more wickedly the society seems to live. The example used is of course the US. In the United States 85% of the people consider themselves religious, but the U.S. also has the highest rates of teen pregnancy, homicides, and sexually transmitted diseases.
Why is this so? The article makes a valid point that the more religious a nation considers itself, the less money the government will invest in social projects. Perhaps under the assumption that issues of morality will be handled by God. Personally I feel one of the US is so morally inept is because we take the separation of church and state to an extreme in most cases. We are so stuck on the idea that publicly teaching about God is bad, that we also do not teach the good that comes from a relationship with God. I do understand that a nation built on the foundations of religious freedoms as we are, can not effectively promote one religion without consequence, so really this is a catch 22...teach about the greatness of God, and cause civil unrest…or don’t and cause civil immorality…there’s no winning (and that’s not really the point of this post…so back to the subject at hand).
DW makes a valid point in that almost every war or evil that has been conducted by mankind on mankind can be attributed to religion in one way or another. I do not however feel religion is to blame for this fact…it is man’s perversion of religion that is the cause. Most if not all the world’s religions revolve a central theme of peace and respect…men in an attempt to declare their way of thought correct, overlooks these central beliefs. A couple of examples: Islamic extremists wage a holy war against the United States and our non Islamic allies (I know some will say it’s because we are over there that they wage this war…but I feel the sentiment will remain if not a single American remained in the mid east). Like wise, recent history will also show the destruction and war waged in Northern Ireland between (I believe) protestants and Catholics (I could be way off on that one, but I believe both warring factions were Christian in faith).
Let’s define religion. According to http://dictionary. net religion can be defined as a set of beliefs, values, and practices based on the teachings of a spiritual leader. Let’s dig a bit deeper… “the teachings of…”; teach: to impart wisdom and knowledge of. Of what? If we are to say that religion teaches anything I would say moral behavior. Deeper…a person is considered moral by being conformed to rules of right; acting in accordance with such rules; virtuous; or if that person is just in his actions. So what makes certain rules “good”. Good is defined as possessing desirable qualities. Granted what is desirable to different people varies, but let’s not drag this out longer than need be.
So religion then can be defined thusly: the teaching, or imparting the knowledge of, rules, or behaviors, or dare I say works that are good; that contain desirable qualities. This definition is that of man, if I look to the NIV study Bible and seek a definition for the term religion, I am led only to James 1:27 “Religion that God accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world”. My NKJV ends that passage with being unspotted by the world, as opposed to unpolluted…both in my eyes are good.
So religion that God finds pure and good is a religion of compassion and love. Actions that benefit the needy of society. Jesus teaches us of love, and forgiveness, and passiveness. Other parts of the Bible (in the teachings of Paul) we are told to not let the sun go down on our anger. So if these are the teachings of our spiritual leaders, and we have conformed to them…religion does no harm.
My conclusion is a point that I have stressed and many others in these forums have stressed. It is when mankind takes the assumption that we have a power to determine right from wrong on our own, without the guidance of God…or a spiritual teacher, that the evils of the world take over. “It is not for man that walks to direct even his own step”. If we will use the power of the precious gift of free will to turn freely to God for direction in our lives, we will turn away from the evil fallen world in which we live, and Satan will lose his grasp on our society.
DW may tell you to turn to God for knowledge, and no one can deny the pureness of that teaching…I will say if you ever have doubts that God hears you, turn to a religious leader that you trust, turn to the Bible, turn to Jesus as our savior, if you don’t feel comfortable with either of these…talk to a star in the sky. What ever method you choose, if you feel you need the knowledge of what is good…seek it. “Seek and you will find, ask and it will be answered, knock and it will be opened”. The more time that is spent seeking what is good…the less time can be spent doing what is not. Religion is not bad…perversion of religion is what does harm.
Consider the words of George Washington “Let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion”.